Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753341AbbBPDky (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2015 22:40:54 -0500 Received: from mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com ([67.231.156.173]:25903 "EHLO mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750954AbbBPDkx (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2015 22:40:53 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:37:38 +0800 From: Jisheng Zhang To: Antoine Tenart CC: "sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com" , "mturquette@linaro.org" , "sboyd@codeaurora.org" , Jimmy Xu , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: berlin: refactor the clock Message-ID: <20150216113738.281f226a@xhacker> In-Reply-To: <1423845781-7480-1-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> References: <1423845781-7480-1-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.13.68,1.0.33,0.0.0000 definitions=2015-02-16_01:2015-02-13,2015-02-15,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1502160038 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2376 Lines: 62 Hi all, On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:42:54 -0800 Antoine Tenart wrote: > Hi, > > Marvell Berlin SoCs have a chip control register set providing several > individual registers dealing with various controllers (pinctrl, reset, > clk). This chip controller is described by a single DT node since the > individual registers are spread among the chip control register bank. > > Marvell Berlin also have a system control register set providing several > individual registers for pinctrl or adc. There's no chip control IP. The HW just put some HW registers into the so called "chip control" address space, the registers in this space are mostly used for "control" purpose, but some are not. Take the clk as an example, some clocks' registers are put into the system control register space, some clocks' are not. So far, there are five type of clocks in Berlin (from the driver programmer's point of view): 1. gate clocks. The clocks may share register. The clocks can only be gated or ungated. 2. individual clocks. The clock doesn't share registers with each other. The gate/ungate, clock source selection, clock divider etc. bits of each clock are put into one individual register. one register per clock. 3. group clocks. The gate/ungate bits of these clocks are grouped into one register, the clock source selection, clock divider bits of these clocks are grouped into another one or two register. 4. plls. The pll doesn't share registers with each other. For example, syspll, cpupll etc. one or two register per pll 5. fixed clock. the oscillator used for reference clock. In newer chips, there are no group clocks any more. So the driver code can be more simpler and clean. So I think we'd better to implement drivers without the "chip control" concept in mind. The previous clock patches reflect what the HW really does. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/21/413 https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/24/624 The above is just my humble opinions and the current berlin clk driver is different with the previous one I dunno how can we handle this situation now. I really need help! Thanks, Jisheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/