Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753927AbbBPGRR (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2015 01:17:17 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34858 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752024AbbBPGRQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2015 01:17:16 -0500 Message-ID: <1424067417.4134.15.camel@pluto.fritz.box> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/8] kmod - teach call_usermodehelper() to use a namespace From: Ian Kent To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Kernel Mailing List , David Howells , Trond Myklebust , "J. Bruce Fields" , Benjamin Coddington , Al Viro , Jeff Layton , "Eric W. Biederman" Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 14:16:57 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20150210165503.GA6797@redhat.com> References: <20150205021553.8382.16297.stgit@pluto.fritz.box> <20150205023410.8382.13695.stgit@pluto.fritz.box> <20150208190019.GA22948@redhat.com> <1423446203.2583.18.camel@pluto.fritz.box> <20150209160328.GA2817@redhat.com> <1423526889.2612.14.camel@pluto.fritz.box> <20150210165503.GA6797@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1671 Lines: 47 On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 17:55 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 02/10, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 17:03 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > > > I understand. but I still can't understand why we can't implement something > > > like > > > enter_ns(struct nsproxy *p) > > > { > > > new_nsproxy = create_new_namespaces(...); > > > > > > p->mnt_ns->ns->ops->install(new_nsproxy, ...); > > > p->pid_ns_for_children->ns->ops->install(new_nsproxy, ...); > > > ... > > > > > > switch_task_namespaces(new_nsproxy); > > > } > > > > > > Why we should abuse fs/proc ? > > > > That sounds like a much better approach. > > Your saying just take a reference to the nsproxy from the located > > process and use it instead, right? > > Yes, I'm still not sure if this can be done (at least without surgery to the namespace implementation) and I think I've been here before which is what lead to the file_open_root() approach. The difficulty is the second parameter to the install() call above, the struct ns_common. In setns() it's obtained from the procfs file inode and the file open is what's used to obtain each namespace type (in the form of a struct ns_common) from a process context different from current, current being the thread runner process. I might still be able to work out a (viable) way to obtain the appropriate ns_common struct in each case without a file open but it's hard to see how. Ian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/