Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:29:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:29:19 -0500 Received: from snowbird.megapath.net ([216.200.176.7]:21773 "EHLO megapathdsl.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:29:07 -0500 Message-ID: <3A886432.5070302@megapathdsl.net> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:31:14 -0800 From: Miles Lane User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-pre2 i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20010208 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Laberge CC: Juergen Schneider , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Animated framebuffer logo for 2.4.1 In-Reply-To: <20010201183231.A373@tuxia.com> <3A880004.51C92911@videotron.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Martin Laberge wrote: > Juergen Schneider wrote: > > >> Hello everybody, >> >> I've created a patch for kernel 2.4.1 that adds some fancy options for >> the framebuffer console driver concerning the boot logo. >> I've added logo animation and logo centering. >> People may find this not very useful but nice to look at. :-) >> >> It can be downloaded from: >> >> >> With this tar ball comes the patch for kernel 2.4.1 and a small >> program called xpm2splash to create animated linux_logo.h files >> from XPM files. >> The patch also contains an animated boot logo (that's why it is >> so big). >> It is the dancing penguin I've taken from the apache default >> configuration of a SuSE 6.4 distribution. >> (BTW who created this nice animation???) >> >> So, try it and send your comments. >> >> Juergen Schneider >> >> PS: The patch should work with kernel 2.4.0 too. >> >> PPS: Our FTP server seems to have some problems with the "ls" >> command. You should use "ls -l" or "dir" to get a >> directory listing. Sorry for that. >> >> -- >> Dipl.-Inf. Juergen Schneider >> TUXIA Deutschland GmbH > > > I beleive it is a very good idea... there has been many objections where > SYSTEM-HANG or CRASH or ANY-BAD-THING > would be difficult to trace for the geek... BUT , are you all believing the > system will be crashing most of the time, or will it be > running perfectly most of the time... Linux does crash early in the boot process sometimes. Folks are correct to be worried about handling these early crashes in such a way that the user can learn what is going wrong with the OS. > I believe linux should be one of those systems... you start it and then use > it... it don't crash, don't hang... it works... It does crash and users can't know when it will happen ahead of time. For example, I add a new piece of hardware that triggers a driver bug and BANG, the machine locks up on boot. Now, we can still have a "innocuous pretty boot" process, as long as a boot parameter can be passed so that when a kernel is crashing early in the boot process, the user can disable the prettyboot and get to all the kernel messages. Miles - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://vger.kernel.org/lkml/