Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932260AbbBPJf4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2015 04:35:56 -0500 Received: from mail-gw3-out.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.64]:28533 "EHLO mail-gw3-out.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932081AbbBPJfy (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2015 04:35:54 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,586,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="57063693" Message-ID: <54E1B9F4.6090302@broadcom.com> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:35:48 +0100 From: Arend van Spriel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111103 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Fu, Zhonghui" CC: Kalle Valo , Pat Erley , , Franky Lin , , , , , , , , , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] brcmfmac: avoid duplicated suspend/resume operation References: <54DC1D7D.5050407@linux.intel.com> <54E0072D.3020802@linux.intel.com> <54E01209.7010300@erley.org> <54E05961.7000201@broadcom.com> <878ufzi5s3.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <54E19DA1.4030407@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <54E19DA1.4030407@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1446 Lines: 31 On 02/16/15 08:34, Fu, Zhonghui wrote: > > On 2015/2/15 22:54, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Arend van Spriel writes: >> >>> On 02/15/15 04:27, Pat Erley wrote: >>>> On 02/14/2015 08:40 PM, Fu, Zhonghui wrote: >>>>> Any comments to this patch? Can it be accepted? >>> I assume that patches are queued up until after the merge window that >>> we are currently in. >> That's right. In the future I will most likely apply patches also during >> the merge window, but as I'm still a greenhorn I'll be on the safe and >> wait for the merge window to end. > I am very glad to see this. > Could you please tell which release candidate this patch will be likely merged into now? For which tree are you asking this? When the merge window ends and linus' tree has moved to 3.20-rc1, the wireless-drivers-next will move to that -rc1 as well and pending/accepted patches will be applied for the next kernel release. If you are asking when they will be in linus' tree than the answer is 3.21-rc1. Now if you say this patch solves a real problem for you (providing usual proof like log with stack trace) you can request it to go on the wireless-drivers tree to be fixed for 3.20. Regards, Arend -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/