From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
        Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 082/152] virtio: use dev_to_virtio wrapper in virtio
In-Reply-To: <lsq.1424137613.17418214@decadent.org.uk>
References: <lsq.1424137613.17418214@decadent.org.uk>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:56:29 +1030
Message-ID: <873865t8fu.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 765
Lines: 21

Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> writes:
> 3.2.67-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

Ben, what are your criteria for putting patches into 3.2?

This patch is a trivial cleanup.  It doesn't fix anything, but it does
add some churn.

I can see that 083 and 084 follow this, but 083 needed a backport
anyway.  And it wasn't an issue we saw in Real Life (device removal
is rare), so it wasn't CC: stable.

084 was a comment addition.  Backporting that just seems weird.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/