Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 10:12:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 10:12:54 -0500 Received: from elin.scali.no ([62.70.89.10]:4362 "EHLO elin.scali.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 10:12:53 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 16:24:36 +0100 (CET) From: Steffen Persvold X-X-Sender: sp@sp-laptop.isdn.scali.no To: Alan Cox cc: "David S. Miller" , Jeff Garzik , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: NAPI and tg3 In-Reply-To: <1041875880.17472.47.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1111 Lines: 29 On 6 Jan 2003, Alan Cox wrote: > > Ok I can try that, but what about the nice level of ksoftirqd ? Any > > specific reason for it beeing 19 (lowest priority) and not 0 (equally to > > most other processes in the system) ? > > Its triggered (in theory but not practice) only when we are overloaded, in > which case we want to do other *useful* work first rather than using all > the cpu to process requests we can't fulfill > I've also tried the NAPI patch for e1000 and it experience the same performance problem with multithreaded apps. The "NAPI-HOWTO" doesn't mention that this could be an issue at all. Does any of the NAPI authors (Jeff ?) have any comments ? Regards, -- Steffen Persvold | Scali AS mailto:sp@scali.com | http://www.scali.com Tel: (+47) 2262 8950 | Olaf Helsets vei 6 Fax: (+47) 2262 8951 | N0621 Oslo, NORWAY - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/