Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 10:42:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 10:42:53 -0500 Received: from pcp701542pcs.bowie01.md.comcast.net ([68.50.82.18]:6895 "EHLO lucifer.gotontheinter.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 10:42:52 -0500 Subject: Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" From: Disconnect To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20030106233310.GG10752@merlin.emma.line.org> References: <200301050802.h0582u4214558@saturn.cs.uml.edu> <20030106173705.GP1386@work.bitmover.com> <20030106233310.GG10752@merlin.emma.line.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 07 Jan 2003 10:47:49 -0500 Message-Id: <1041954470.15859.3.camel@sparky> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 992 Lines: 25 I'd [g]uess [n]ot too many, b[u]t the [linux] kernel list admins are pretty good about keeping the bans non-political. Whoops, looks like this messa[g]e gets sent to /dev/[nu]ll. So much for [linux] development discussion.. Maybe without the .*s all over the place.... (For the humour impaired, no, I'm not actually advocating such a ban.) On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 18:33, Matthias Andree wrote: > How many false rejects would a g.*n.*u.*l.*i.*n.*u.*x ban regexp cause > for this list BTW? > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/