Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S267488AbTAGRRj>; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 12:17:39 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S267368AbTAGRRe>; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 12:17:34 -0500
Received: from fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com ([66.185.86.72]:61710
	"EHLO fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com") by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id <S267477AbTAGRQ2>; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 12:16:28 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: "Dimitrie O. Paun" <dpaun@rogers.com>
Reply-To: dpaun@rogers.com
Organization: DSSD Software Inc.
To: rms@gnu.org, lm@bitmover.com
Subject: Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 11:18:41 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3
Cc: acahalan@cs.uml.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <200301050802.h0582u4214558@saturn.cs.uml.edu> <20030106173705.GP1386@work.bitmover.com> <E18Vtxy-0002c2-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <E18Vtxy-0002c2-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Message-Id: <200301071118.41059.dpaun@rogers.com>
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [24.103.156.204] using ID <dpaun@rogers.com> at Tue, 7 Jan 2003 12:24:19 -0500
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1501
Lines: 32

On January 7, 2003 08:40 am, Richard Stallman wrote:
> These two cases are similar, but not in the way you think.  In both
> cases a large structure that is basically GNU or of GNU has a
> component that is Linux or of Linux.

Richard,

You are a smart guy. I think you'd agree with me that this particular
battle (GNU/Linux) is lost. Assuming you are right, is it worth continuing
to fight? I know you have a very strong sentimental attachment to GNU,
and that's more than understandable. But in the great scheme of things,
it's a minor issue. As much as you like them to, people don't attach 
semantics to names. Period. They just want a catchy label, and that's all. 
Damn, they don't even know what a kernel is, let alone subtleties 
concerning the naming.

Bottom line is, the are only so many hours in a day. You have so many 
battles to fight, that would serve the community. Why continue this one,
when it's clear that all it's going is harming your reputation and
credibility. It's harming the community. Yeah, you could argue that
*if* things were different... but they are not! Given the present day
situation, it must be clear even to you that things can't possibly go
back, and all your doing is creating bad blood. Think about it.

-- 
Dimi.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/