Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 12:59:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 12:59:08 -0500 Received: from robur.slu.se ([130.238.98.12]:27916 "EHLO robur.slu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 12:59:08 -0500 From: Robert Olsson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15899.6490.732494.523858@robur.slu.se> Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 19:15:54 +0100 To: "Avery Fay" Cc: Anton Blanchard , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Gigabit/SMP performance problem In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.92 under Emacs 19.34.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1182 Lines: 28 Avery Fay writes: > Hmm. That paper is actually very interesting. I'm thinking maybe with the > P4 I'm better off with only 1 cpu. WRT hyperthreading, I actually disabled > it because it make performance worse (wasn't clear in the original email). With 1CPU-SMP-HT I'm on UP level of performance this with forwarding two single flows evenly distributes between CPU's. So HT payed the SMP cost so to say. Also I tested the MB bandwidth with new threaded version of pktgen just TX'ing a packets on 6 GIGE I'm seeing almost 6 Gbit/s TX'ed w 1500 bytes packets. I have problem populating all slots w. GIGE NIC's. WoL (Wake on Lan) this is a real pain... Seems like my adapters needs a standby current 0.8A and most Power Supplies gives 2.0A for this. (Number come from SuperMicro). So booting fails radomlingy. You have 8 NIC's -- Didn't you have problem? Anyway I'll guess profiling is needed? Cheers. --ro - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/