Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 13:06:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 13:06:41 -0500 Received: from chaos.analogic.com ([204.178.40.224]:49536 "EHLO chaos.analogic.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 13:06:39 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 13:17:35 -0500 (EST) From: "Richard B. Johnson" Reply-To: root@chaos.analogic.com To: Max Valdez cc: Jan Hudec , kernel Subject: Re: Undelete files on ext3 ?? In-Reply-To: <1041961118.13635.10.camel@garaged.fis.unam.mx> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2324 Lines: 62 On 7 Jan 2003, Max Valdez wrote: > > > > > By the way, there used to be undelete tool for ext2. It created a list > > of deleted inodes with correct stat, but no names, only their inode > > numbers. You could then pick the corect inode and give it a name, thus > > bringing it back to life. Since ext3 is just ext2 with journal, I guess > > it might work. It existed as a standalone tool and integrated to > > midnight commander. > > > I think there must be some other differences between ext2 and ext3, I've > tryed e2undel and unrm, both made for ext2, and none of them found any > deleted inode. > > I umonted immediately the drive, and nothing has been writen on it after > the rm * > > Thanks for the comments ! > I will keep searching ! > Max There is a project waiting for someone who wants to contribute. It only slightly involves the kernel, but is quite useful. As more people are switching from the Redmond stuff to Linux, many have "learned" from the Redmond stuff that `rm` isn't permanent. You can always get it back from the `wastebasket`. Of course, the Unix gurus know you can't. Therefore, it's time for somebody to put a 'dumpster` in all the Linux file-systems. Somebody should then modify `rm` and the kernel unlink to `mv' files to the dumpster directory on the file-system, instead of really deleting them. Then, just like the Redmond stuff, a separate program can be used to clear out the "dumpster" or `mv` them back. Since sys_unlink() takes only a path-name, there isn't a current mechanism whereby it could take a flag to tell it to 'really' delete a file (or is there?). So, maybe we need a new kernel function? Just hacking existing utilities won't do the whole thing because we need programs that delete files to transparently put them into the dumpster as well. The wastebasket should be called a hopper or a dumpster so Redmond doesn't get confused and send lawyers. Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.4.18 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips). Why is the government concerned about the lunatic fringe? Think about it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/