Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753221AbbBRUTI (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2015 15:19:08 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:3734 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753021AbbBRUTE (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2015 15:19:04 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,603,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="654014346" Message-ID: <1424290743.9530.122.camel@schen9-desk2.jf.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci-dma: Fix x86 dma_alloc_coherent to fully clear all pages returned From: Tim Chen To: Alan Stern Cc: Sergei Shtylyov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , "H. Peter Anvin" , Akinobu Mita , Mathias Nyman , Andi Kleen , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Marek Szyprowski , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, stable Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 12:19:03 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.5 (3.8.5-2.fc19) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1328 Lines: 47 On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 14:53 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 18 Feb 2015, Tim Chen wrote: > > > On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 10:30 -0800, Tim Chen wrote: > > > On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 19:39 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, is this an open-coded version of PAGE_ALIGN? > > > > > > > > Yes, it appears so. :-) > > > > > > > > WBR, Sergei > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the suggestion by Jiri. I updated the patch to use PAGE_ALIGN > > > below. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Tim > > > > > > > Is there any resolution on this patch? I haven't seen fixes from the > > XHCI folks yet. This is breaking many of our systems. > > Have you tried doing the experiments I suggested in > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=142272448620716&w=2 > > to determine where the problem occurs? > I was bogged down with other things lately and I haven't got a chance to test that. But as you said, there's very few places where xhci call this memory allocation. So I think the problem has been fairly narrowed down for the XHCI folks. Tim > Alan Stern > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/