From: <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>
To: <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
CC: <dinh.linux@gmail.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>,
        Pratik Patel <pratikp@codeaurora.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] arm: cti: fix build for cti.h
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:09:44 -0600
Message-ID: <1424326185-31463-1-git-send-email-dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Feb 2015 06:14:50.4024 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM2PR0301MB1198
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 871
Lines: 29

From: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>

Hi,

I would to like check to see if this is right thing to do for cti.h. Our
downstream kernel's PMU support is using cti.h. But I don't see any other
upstream driver using cti.h, so I'm not sure if this file should be removed?

Thanks,

Dinh Nguyen (1):
  arm: cti: fix up cti pmu build

 arch/arm/include/asm/cti.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
Cc: Pratik Patel <pratikp@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
--
2.2.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/