Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753341AbbBSR36 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:29:58 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:35520 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751708AbbBSR35 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:29:57 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:29:52 -0700 From: Gilad Avidov To: Josh Cartwright Cc: sdharia@codeaurora.org, mlocke@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iivanov@mm-sol.com, galak@codeaurora.org, agross@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] spmi: pmic_arb: add support for hw version 2 Message-ID: <20150219102952.469e7754@gavidov-lnx.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: <20150218153446.GA3485@kryptos> References: <1423522272-24472-1-git-send-email-gavidov@codeaurora.org> <1423522272-24472-3-git-send-email-gavidov@codeaurora.org> <20150218153446.GA3485@kryptos> Organization: Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3674 Lines: 119 Hi Josh, Thank you for the review. On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:34:46 -0600 Josh Cartwright wrote: > Hey Gilad- > > On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 03:51:12PM -0700, Gilad Avidov wrote: > > Qualcomm PMIC Arbiter version-2 changes from version-1 are: > > > > - Some different register offsets. > > - New channel register space, one per PMIC peripheral (ppid). > > All tx traffic uses these channels. > > - New observer register space. All rx trafic uses this space. > > - Different command format for spmi command registers. > > > > Acked-by: Sagar Dharia > > Signed-off-by: Gilad Avidov > [..] > > +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c > [..] > > @@ -645,12 +795,65 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct > > platform_device *pdev) pa->spmic = ctrl; > > > > res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, > > "core"); > > - pa->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&ctrl->dev, res); > > - if (IS_ERR(pa->base)) { > > - err = PTR_ERR(pa->base); > > + pa->rd_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&ctrl->dev, res); > > This seems like an awkward way to do this, especially if you end up > remapping it... Agree. I think the following will fix it: 1. Assign the core reg base to a local variable. 2. For v1: assign that local to rd/wr base. 3. For v2: devm_unmap() that core. > > > + if (IS_ERR(pa->rd_base)) { > > + err = PTR_ERR(pa->rd_base); > > goto err_put_ctrl; > > } > > > > + hw_ver = readl_relaxed(pa->rd_base + PMIC_ARB_VERSION); > > + is_v1 = (hw_ver < PMIC_ARB_VERSION_V2_MIN); > > + > > + dev_info(&ctrl->dev, "PMIC Arb Version-%d (0x%x)\n", > > (is_v1 ? 1 : 2), > > + hw_ver); > > + > > + if (is_v1) { > > + pa->ver_ops = &pmic_arb_v1; > > + pa->wr_base = pa->rd_base; > > + } else { > > + u8 chan; > > + u16 ppid; > > + u32 regval; > > + > > + pa->ver_ops = &pmic_arb_v2; > > + > > + pa->ppid_to_chan = devm_kzalloc(&ctrl->dev, > > + PPID_TO_CHAN_TABLE_SZ, > > GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!pa->ppid_to_chan) { > > + err = -ENOMEM; > > + goto err_put_ctrl; > > + } > > + /* > > + * PMIC_ARB_REG_CHNL is a table in HW mapping > > channel to ppid. > > + * ppid_to_chan is an in-memory invert of that > > table. > > + */ > > + for (chan = 0; chan < PMIC_ARB_MAX_CHNL; ++chan) { > > + regval = readl_relaxed(pa->rd_base + > > + > > PMIC_ARB_REG_CHNL(chan)); > > + if (!regval) > > + continue; > > + > > + ppid = (regval >> 8) & 0xFFF; > > + pa->ppid_to_chan[ppid] = chan; > > + } > > + > > + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, > > IORESOURCE_MEM, > > + "obsrvr"); > > + pa->rd_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&ctrl->dev, > > res); > > ...here. Especially because now you have some loose mapping hanging > around for the lifetime of the device. I'd suggest splitting the v1 > and v2 probe routines out into their own functions. > 75% of the probe code is common. By splitting to two probes that code will be duplicated. Of course we can factor out the commonality, but then will end up with a similar situation as here. Splitting the probes will not rid us of needing the core reg space for either version, since we need the core to access the version register. > Josh > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Thank you, Gilad -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/