Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753452AbbBSRjU (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:39:20 -0500 Received: from mail-ig0-f175.google.com ([209.85.213.175]:52473 "EHLO mail-ig0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753298AbbBSRjS (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:39:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20150218222544.GA17717@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:39:18 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: GiTbchbCDicOxt3wUBqGdLzOKF0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: smp_call_function_single lockups From: Linus Torvalds To: Rafael David Tinoco Cc: Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Jens Axboe , Frederic Weisbecker , Gema Gomez , Christopher Arges , "the arch/x86 maintainers" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 638 Lines: 17 On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Are there known errata for the x2apic? .. and in particular, do we still have to worry about the traditional local apic "if there are more than two pending interrupts per priority level, things get lost" problem? I forget the exact details. Hopefully somebody remembers. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/