Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755079AbbBTQy0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:54:26 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:46706 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752281AbbBTQyZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:54:25 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:54:09 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/4] Programmatic nestable expedited grace periods Message-ID: <20150220165409.GU5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20150220050850.GA32639@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150220091107.GN21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150220163737.GL5745@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150220163737.GL5745@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1101 Lines: 25 On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 08:37:37AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:11:07AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > So I though we wanted to get rid / limit the expedited stuff because its > > IPI happy, and here its spreading. > > Well, at least it no longer IPIs idle CPUs. ;-) > > And this is during boot, when a few extra IPIs should not be a big deal. Well the one application now is during boot; but you expose the interface for all to use, and therefore someone will. > > Does it really make a machine boot much faster? Why are people using > > synchronous gp primitives if they care about speed? Should we not fix > > that instead? > > The report I heard was that it provided 10-15% faster boot times. That's not insignificant; got more details? I think we should really look at why people are using the sync primitives. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/