Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754473AbbBTS1x (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:27:53 -0500 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:60635 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752281AbbBTS1v (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:27:51 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:27:45 -0800 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/4] Programmatic nestable expedited grace periods Message-ID: <20150220182745.GN5745@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20150220050850.GA32639@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150220091107.GN21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150220163737.GL5745@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150220165409.GU5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150220171442.GM5745@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <54E76FB7.4060005@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54E76FB7.4060005@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 15022018-0005-0000-0000-000008F6125C Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1353 Lines: 35 On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:32:39AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > >>>>Does it really make a machine boot much faster? Why are people using > >>>>synchronous gp primitives if they care about speed? Should we not fix > >>>>that instead? > >>> > >>>The report I heard was that it provided 10-15% faster boot times. > >> > >>That's not insignificant; got more details? I think we should really > >>look at why people are using the sync primitives. > > > >I must defer to the people who took the exact measurements. > > > >But yes, once I have that info, I should add it to the commit log. > > so the two most obvious cases are > > Registering sysrq keys ... even when the old key code had no handler > (have a patch pending for this) > > registering idle handlers > (this is more tricky, it's very obvious abuse but the fix is less clear) > > there's a few others as well that I'm chasing down... > .. but the flip side, prior to running ring 3 code, why NOT do fast expedites? It would be good to have before-and-after measurements of actual boot time. Are these numbers available? Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/