Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751052AbbBUKbP (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Feb 2015 05:31:15 -0500 Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([80.244.247.6]:34439 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750749AbbBUKbO (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Feb 2015 05:31:14 -0500 Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 11:31:04 +0100 From: Florian Westphal To: Tomas Szepe Cc: Florian Westphal , Francois Romieu , Hayes Wang , Eric Dumazet , Tom Herbert , "David S. Miller" , Marco Berizzi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 1e918876 breaks r8169 (linux-3.18+) Message-ID: <20150221103104.GA26574@breakpoint.cc> References: <20150203100816.GA5807@louise.pinerecords.com> <20150203104214.GG24751@breakpoint.cc> <20150210154536.GB16264@breakpoint.cc> <20150221101512.GB17223@louise.pinerecords.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150221101512.GB17223@louise.pinerecords.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1380 Lines: 39 Tomas Szepe wrote: > > I tried to reproduce this without success so far on my RTL8168d/8111d device. > > I've been running 40 parallel netperf TCP_STREAM tests (1gbit) for the > > last 5 hours and so far I saw no watchdog tx timeouts. > > > > I'll keep this running for a day or so to see if it just takes more time > > to trigger. > > So, how's this coming along? Don't you think the patch should be reverted > until the problem is diagnosed/understood/fixed? Sorry. David, please consider reverting 1e918876853aa85435e0f17fd8b4a92dcfff53d6 (r8169: add support for Byte Queue Limits) and 0bec3b700d106a8b0a34227b2976d1a582f1aab7 (r8169: add support for xmit_more) I cannot reproduce any hangs (tried for 2days with 40 parallel netperfs using both 100mbit and 1gbit receiver). And I don't see anything wrong with the change either. Seems like some revisions of the HW are just dodgy? I hate giving up, but I have no means to diagnose this any further. Even reporter says it doesn't affect all of his r8169 nics. So I think the change is correct per se, but might be revealing some HW/firmware bug. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/