Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752745AbbBUPvj (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Feb 2015 10:51:39 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:4908 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751719AbbBUPvg (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Feb 2015 10:51:36 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,620,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="681329488" Message-ID: <54E8A986.4090302@linux.intel.com> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 07:51:34 -0800 From: Arjan van de Ven User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com CC: Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/4] Programmatic nestable expedited grace periods References: <20150220050850.GA32639@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150220091107.GN21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150220163737.GL5745@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150220165409.GU5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150220171442.GM5745@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <54E76FB7.4060005@linux.intel.com> <20150220182745.GN5745@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20150220182745.GN5745@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1078 Lines: 27 >> >> there's a few others as well that I'm chasing down... >> .. but the flip side, prior to running ring 3 code, why NOT do fast expedites? > > It would be good to have before-and-after measurements of actual > boot time. Are these numbers available? To show the boot time, I'm using the timestamp of the "Write protecting" line, that's pretty much the last thing we print prior to ring 3 execution. A kernel with default RCU behavior (inside KVM, only virtual devices) looks like this: [ 0.038724] Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 10240k a kernel with expedited RCU (using the command line option, so that I don't have to recompile between measurements and thus am completely oranges-to-oranges) [ 0.031768] Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 10240k which, in percentage, is an 18% improvement. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/