Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:25:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:24:57 -0500 Received: from red.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.70]:44504 "EHLO red.csi.cam.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:24:41 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 00:24:08 +0000 (GMT) From: James Sutherland To: "H. Peter Anvin" cc: Alan Cox , Werner Almesberger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 In-Reply-To: <3A8876FA.EA2034D1@transmeta.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > James Sutherland wrote: > > > > > > Depends on what the client can handle. For the kernel, that might be > > > true, but for example a boot loader may only have a few K worth of buffer > > > space. > > > > Fortunately, the bulky stuff (printk's from the booting kernel) will be > > going from the boot loader to the server, and should be buffered there > > OK until they can be processed. Only the stuff sent to the client will > > need buffering, and that should be simple keystrokes... > > Well, any time there is a network there needs to be buffering, if you > want to have any kind of ACK protocol. Yes, but only the last packet sent, if you limit to one packet at a time... Shouldn't be a problem, even for the smallest code. James. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://vger.kernel.org/lkml/