Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:26:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:26:27 -0500 Received: from neon-gw.transmeta.com ([209.10.217.66]:34572 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:26:20 -0500 Message-ID: <3A887F17.BA083B28@transmeta.com> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:25:59 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Organization: Transmeta Corporation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.1 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, sv, no, da, es, fr, ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Werner Almesberger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > > > I'm sure you can. That doesn't mean it's the right solution. > > And the UDP proposal will be at least as big if it does retransmits, and if > it doesnt , its junk. It will also need as much buffering, if not the same > packing trick > Within limits, you're right, of course. I suspect it won't be *as* big (especially not if it's talking to a PXE card which does the IP and UDP layers in firmware, but not TCP), but I still suspect better tradeoffs can be made this way. That being said, I'll look at TCP as well. -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://vger.kernel.org/lkml/