Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S267814AbTAHOjR>; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 09:39:17 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S267815AbTAHOjQ>; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 09:39:16 -0500
Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:59398 "EHLO
	gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S267814AbTAHOjQ>; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 09:39:16 -0500
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 09:32:21 -0500 (EST)
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>, "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>,
       Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: observations on 2.5 config screens
In-Reply-To: <1041982936.694.786.camel@phantasy>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1030108093021.21759B-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 820
Lines: 23

On 7 Jan 2003, Robert Love wrote:

> The real problem in my opinion is that the category is misnamed.  It is
> not "processor options" except for the first couple.  The majority of
> the options should be under a title of "core" or "architecture" or
> "system options" in my opinion.
> 
> 	Robert Love

Someone else suggested putting all the low level options like preempt,
smp, and the stuff in kernel-hacking into a single menu, with a better
name.

-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/