Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752507AbbBXIky (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2015 03:40:54 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f182.google.com ([209.85.192.182]:38927 "EHLO mail-pd0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751090AbbBXIkx (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2015 03:40:53 -0500 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:40:49 -0800 From: Brian Norris To: Felix Fietkau Cc: Rodrigo Freire , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel , dwmw2@infradead.org, Herton Krzesinski Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mtd: block2mtd: Removes PAGE_MASK as a index to partition size Message-ID: <20150224084049.GH24441@norris-Latitude-E6410> References: <1807144344.40128259.1410985683342.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20141105202303.GN23619@ld-irv-0074> <2086372266.7454667.1415535533979.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <1874445287.7454806.1415535792984.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20141126072147.GO3212@norris-Latitude-E6410> <1417070032.4547583.1417007972343.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20150224080752.GF24441@norris-Latitude-E6410> <54EC344F.3050709@openwrt.org> <20150224082725.GG24441@norris-Latitude-E6410> <54EC369D.7090108@openwrt.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54EC369D.7090108@openwrt.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1465 Lines: 34 On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 09:30:21PM +1300, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2015-02-24 21:27, Brian Norris wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 09:20:31PM +1300, Felix Fietkau wrote: > >> On 2015-02-24 21:07, Brian Norris wrote: > >> > OK let's drop this patch from the series. At best, we could just do > >> > something like this instead: > >> > > >> > - dev->mtd.size = dev->blkdev->bd_inode->i_size & PAGE_MASK; > >> > + dev->mtd.size = dev->blkdev->bd_inode->i_size; > >> > > >> > But that's really just an unnecessary change. > >> If I remember correctly, it was problematic to have a dev->mtd.size > >> value which is not a multiple of the erase size. I think that was the > >> reason for patch 3. > > > > The what's this for? > > > > if ((long)dev->blkdev->bd_inode->i_size % erase_size) { > > pr_err("erasesize must be a divisor of device size\n"); > > goto err_free_block2mtd; > > } > I think we should just trim the mtd size to a multiple of erase size and > remove this check. It is a bit impractical for many cases. Well that's not the subject of anything in this series, and this patch does not stand alone well, so I'm not taking it. Feel free to send a different patch if you have good reason to. Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/