Message-ID: <54EC3B8A.1030905@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:51:22 +0200
From: Boaz Harrosh <openosd@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>
CC: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Roger C. Pao" <rcpao.enmotus@gmail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] e820: Don't let unknown DIMM type come out BUSY
References: <54EB1D33.3050107@plexistor.com> <54EB1E03.4010306@plexistor.com> <1424751767.9050.4.camel@intel.com> <54EC2F4E.1080606@plexistor.com> <20150224083432.GB19398@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150224083432.GB19398@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1460
Lines: 49

On 02/24/2015 10:34 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 02/24/2015 06:22 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> <>
>>>> By Popular demand An Extra WARNING message is printed if
>>>> an "UNKNOWN" is found. It will look like this:
>>>>   e820: WARNING [mem 0x100000000-0x1ffffffff] is unknown type 12
>>>
>>> I don't think we need to warn that an unknown range was 
>>> published, just warn if it is consumed.
>>
>> I did not have it at first, Ingo asked for it. I don't 
>> mind having it and I don't mind not. I'd say it is Ingo's 
>> call.
> 
> So at least initially I really would like system operators 
> to be informed when the BIOS does something unexpected to 
> the kernel, especially when it comes to memory mappings.
> 

OK, yes makes sense.

> Later on, if it turns out to be benign, we can remove the 
> warning.
> 

OK So here it is, with this one patch we are back to
business. If we want the warning on lock than we
have the 2nd patch, Any version you like.

And please, please lets also put in the 3A/3 patch
so we can positively scan for specifically these
chips in /proc/iomem instead of blindly try any
"reserved-unknown" types.

> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo

Thanks
Boaz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/