Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 11:35:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 11:35:16 -0500 Received: from home.wiggy.net ([213.84.101.140]:4329 "EHLO mx1.wiggy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 11:35:15 -0500 Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 17:43:47 +0100 From: Wichert Akkerman To: Maciej Soltysiak Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs Message-ID: <20030108164347.GK22951@wiggy.net> Mail-Followup-To: Maciej Soltysiak , netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030108150201.GA30490@wiggy.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1040 Lines: 28 Previously Maciej Soltysiak wrote: > I do not know how many tunnels are in my path, i know that hop distance to > my tunnel is exactly 1 hop (ipv6 broker and ipv4 provider are the same) My tunnel provider is 5 hops away. To my knowledge non of the ipv4 or ipv6 hops in the path are congested and no traffic shaping is done. > If there is immense traffic at one of the routers (total traffic on an > interface) stream packets can be simply dropped if there are no queuing > disciplines that would take eg. flow control into account. I'll ask the ISPs involved to check if this might be happening, but I highly doubt it. > btw. what the hell is JunOs ? Juniper OS, running on Juniper routers. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman http://www.wiggy.net/ A random hacker - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/