Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 15:11:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 15:11:56 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:42422 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 15:11:55 -0500 Message-ID: <3E1C880A.87A93CFA@digeo.com> Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 12:20:26 -0800 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.5.51 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bob_Tracy(0000)" CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: XFree86 vs. 2.5.54 - reboot References: <20030108140525.DF0434EE7@gherkin.frus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jan 2003 20:20:26.0305 (UTC) FILETIME=[6156EB10:01C2B753] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 811 Lines: 18 "Bob_Tracy(0000)" wrote: > > This probably applies to immediately prior kernels in the 2.5 series > as well. 2.5.54 seemed like a good time to jump in and test the waters, > so to speak... > > AMD K6-III 450 running a 2.4.19 kernel with vesafb, XFree86 4.1.0, and > a USB mouse works fine. Same setup with a 2.5.54 kernel does a cold > reboot when I type "startx". I saw exactly the same. In my case it appears to be due to miscompilation of a particular sysenter patch which went into 2.5.53. If you're using gcc-2.91.66 (aka `kgcc') then try 2.95.x instead. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/