Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 15:23:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 15:23:46 -0500 Received: from c16688.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.244.54]:51085 "EHLO mail.kolivas.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 15:23:45 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Con Kolivas To: landley@trommello.org, linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.53 with contest Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 07:32:24 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <200212261038.04015.conman@kolivas.net> <200301071944.18098.landley@trommello.org> In-Reply-To: <200301071944.18098.landley@trommello.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200301090732.24440.conman@kolivas.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1284 Lines: 32 On Wednesday 08 Jan 2003 6:44 am, Rob Landley wrote: > On Wednesday 25 December 2002 23:37, Con Kolivas wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Here are some contest results using osdl hardware: > > > > Uniprocessor: > > process_load: > > Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio > > 2.5.49 [5] 85.2 79 17 20 1.28 > > 2.5.50 [5] 84.8 79 17 19 1.27 > > 2.5.51 [2] 85.2 79 17 20 1.28 > > 2.5.52 [3] 84.4 79 17 19 1.26 > > 2.5.53 [7] 86.9 77 18 21 1.30 > > Could you add a time per load metric? (I.E. 86.9/21=4.14 seconds. Yeah, I > could do the math myself, but that and total time are usually what I'm > trying to compare when I look at these. Maybe it's just me...) If you look at the information carefully the meaningful number is (Loads ) / ( process_load_time - no_load_time) but keep an eye out for a new version soon. Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/