Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 15:25:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 15:25:06 -0500 Received: from [66.70.28.20] ([66.70.28.20]:47885 "EHLO maggie.piensasolutions.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 15:25:03 -0500 Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 21:35:48 +0100 From: DervishD To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Killing off the boot sector (was: [STATUS 2.5] January 8, 2002) Message-ID: <20030108203548.GA6537@DervishD> References: <3E1C2208.6727.5370CB@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: Pleyades User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 979 Lines: 27 Hi HPA :)) > Can we *please* kill off the stupid in-kernel boot sector? Yespleaseyespleaseyesplease... I posted a message here a long time ago because I couldn't boot a raw kernel image with 2.4.x. Well, it didn't work even with a emulated floppy image (El Torito, you know)... I think that, with those good boot loaders out there, this piece of code, that is architecture dependend, should be off-the kernel. IMHO, those saved bytes should be used to store another cool Tux image or something like that XDDDDD > People keep asking what's the harm in keeping it, and the answer is, > quite simply: "because people continue to try to use it." Exact... You've got a very good and sensible idea ;) Ra?l - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/