Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754681AbbB0Hx1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2015 02:53:27 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:53597 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751303AbbB0Hx0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2015 02:53:26 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,658,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="691517891" Message-ID: <54F02271.5070202@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:53:21 +0800 From: "Fu, Zhonghui" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arend van Spriel CC: Kalle Valo , Pat Erley , brudley@broadcom.com, Franky Lin , meuleman@broadcom.com, linville@tuxdriver.com, pieterpg@broadcom.com, hdegoede@redhat.com, wens@csie.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] brcmfmac: avoid duplicated suspend/resume operation References: <54DC1D7D.5050407@linux.intel.com> <54E0072D.3020802@linux.intel.com> <54E01209.7010300@erley.org> <54E05961.7000201@broadcom.com> <878ufzi5s3.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <54E19DA1.4030407@linux.intel.com> <54E1B9F4.6090302@broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: <54E1B9F4.6090302@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1963 Lines: 43 On 2015/2/16 17:35, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 02/16/15 08:34, Fu, Zhonghui wrote: >> >> On 2015/2/15 22:54, Kalle Valo wrote: >>> Arend van Spriel writes: >>> >>>> On 02/15/15 04:27, Pat Erley wrote: >>>>> On 02/14/2015 08:40 PM, Fu, Zhonghui wrote: >>>>>> Any comments to this patch? Can it be accepted? >>>> I assume that patches are queued up until after the merge window that >>>> we are currently in. >>> That's right. In the future I will most likely apply patches also during >>> the merge window, but as I'm still a greenhorn I'll be on the safe and >>> wait for the merge window to end. >> I am very glad to see this. >> Could you please tell which release candidate this patch will be likely merged into now? > > For which tree are you asking this? When the merge window ends and linus' tree has moved to 3.20-rc1, the wireless-drivers-next will move to that -rc1 as well and pending/accepted patches will be applied for the next kernel release. If you are asking when they will be in linus' tree than the answer is 3.21-rc1. Now if you say this patch solves a real problem for you (providing usual proof like log with stack trace) you can request it to go on the wireless-drivers tree to be fixed for 3.20. I was in Chinese new-year vacation these few days. So sorry for late response. Many thanks for your explanation first. Now that there is not 3.20 version. My understanding is that this patch will be in linus' tree 4.1-rc1, right? Thanks, Zhonghui > > Regards, > Arend > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/