Message-ID: <54F07525.4050100@nod.at>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:46:13 +0100
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
CC: lizefan@huawei.com, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
        fweisbec@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] add nproc cgroup subsystem
References: <1424660891-12719-1-git-send-email-cyphar@cyphar.com> <20150227114940.GB3964@htj.duckdns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150227114940.GB3964@htj.duckdns.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 638
Lines: 18

Tejun,

Am 27.02.2015 um 12:49 schrieb Tejun Heo:
> This isn't a proper resource to control.  kmemcg just grew proper
> reclaim support and will be useable to control kernel side of memory
> consumption.

just to make sure that I understand the big picture.
The plan is to limit kernel memory per cgroup such that fork bombs and
stuff cannot harm other groups of processes?

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/