Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755459AbbB0Wil (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:38:41 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:54926 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754962AbbB0Wik (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:38:40 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:38:38 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20150227.173838.45220897334345667.davem@davemloft.net> To: f.fainelli@gmail.com Cc: jaedon.shin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, pgynther@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: bcmgenet: fix throughtput regression From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <54F0ED56.8040201@gmail.com> References: <54F0AB84.50700@gmail.com> <20150227.171043.1173553752636358034.davem@davemloft.net> <54F0ED56.8040201@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.7 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:38:40 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 656 Lines: 17 From: Florian Fainelli Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:19:02 -0800 > If you can take Petri's change now and Jaedon then resubmits on top of > that change, would that be acceptable? I think it should go the other way around. The bug should be fixed in 'net'. Then Petri can resubmit the cleanup relative to that once I merge 'net' into 'net-next'. It's a cleanup so it's a net-next change. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/