Message-ID: <54F0F2B7.1090507@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:41:59 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
CC: jaedon.shin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        eric.dumazet@gmail.com, pgynther@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: bcmgenet: fix throughtput regression
References: <54F0AB84.50700@gmail.com>	<20150227.171043.1173553752636358034.davem@davemloft.net>	<54F0ED56.8040201@gmail.com> <20150227.173838.45220897334345667.davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20150227.173838.45220897334345667.davem@davemloft.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 903
Lines: 28

On 27/02/15 14:38, David Miller wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:19:02 -0800
> 
>> If you can take Petri's change now and Jaedon then resubmits on top of
>> that change, would that be acceptable?
> 
> I think it should go the other way around.

I was not quite sure whether Jaedon's change could be suitable for 'net'
considering how many lines of code it involved changing, but ok, that's
better that way.

> 
> The bug should be fixed in 'net'.
> 
> Then Petri can resubmit the cleanup relative to that once I merge
> 'net' into 'net-next'.  It's a cleanup so it's a net-next change.
> 

Sure.
-- 
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/