Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755605AbbB0X0c (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:26:32 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0125.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.125]:58094 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754770AbbB0X0b (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:26:31 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1567:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3622:3865:3866:3872:3873:4321:5007:6261:10004:10400:10848:11026:11232:11658:11914:12043:12294:12296:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: rail54_55db697fa094b X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1416 Message-ID: <1425079588.2690.20.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] remoteproc/ste: add blank lines after declarations From: Joe Perches To: Suman Anna Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:26:28 -0800 In-Reply-To: <1425079103-41695-2-git-send-email-s-anna@ti.com> References: <1425079103-41695-1-git-send-email-s-anna@ti.com> <1425079103-41695-2-git-send-email-s-anna@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 792 Lines: 22 On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 17:18 -0600, Suman Anna wrote: > Fix couple of checkpatch warnings of the type, > "WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations" [] > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ste_modem_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ste_modem_rproc.c [] > @@ -230,6 +229,7 @@ static int sproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) > static int sproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) > { > struct sproc *sproc = rproc->priv; > + > sproc_dbg(sproc, "stop ste-modem\n"); You could probably delete this sproc_dbg statement too as it duplicates function tracing. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/