Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932564AbbB1ALW (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:11:22 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com ([209.85.214.180]:58307 "EHLO mail-ob0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755820AbbB1ALS (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:11:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150227224846.GB8750@fieldses.org> References: <20150227224846.GB8750@fieldses.org> Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 01:11:17 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC 00/21] Richacls From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_Gr=C3=BCnbacher?= To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 670 Lines: 15 2015-02-27 23:48 GMT+01:00 J. Bruce Fields : > I remember my main concern being how we collapse the ACL and mask bits > to map a richacl to an NFSv4 (or Samba) ACL. What richacl_apply_masks() in librichacl does and what "richacl --get" without the --raw option displays. The basic algorithms are still unchanged: http://www.bestbits.at/richacl/draft-gruenbacher-nfsv4-acls-in-posix-00.html Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/