Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:54:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:54:42 -0500 Received: from vger.timpanogas.org ([207.109.151.240]:26891 "EHLO vger.timpanogas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:54:30 -0500 Message-ID: <39FF4CA5.8F3C2F31@timpanogas.org> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 15:50:13 -0700 From: "Jeff V. Merkey" Organization: TRG, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rik van Riel CC: Larry McVoy , Paul Menage , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks! In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rik van Riel wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > Larry McVoy wrote: > > > > Consider your > > > recent context switch claims. Yes, I believe that you can do the moral > > > equiv of a longjmp() in the kernel in a few cycles, but that isn't a > > > context switch, at least, it isn't the same a context switch in the > > > operating system sense. > > > A context switch in anoperating system context in it's simplest for is > > > > mov x, esp > > mov esp, y > > > > processes with virtual memory? > > Yes. > > Maybe you could tell us how long the context switch > between processes with virtual memory takes, that > would be a more meaningful comparison... > Rik, I'll bring down a NetWare 5 server, and snapshot the context switch code from the NetWare debugger and email to you. Jeff > regards, > > Rik > -- > "What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!" > -- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000 > > http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/