Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 17:44:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 17:44:04 -0500 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:35849 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 17:44:03 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 17:50:07 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Davidsen To: Andrew McGregor cc: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto , Wichert Akkerman , netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs In-Reply-To: <78180000.1042055993@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1094 Lines: 25 On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Andrew McGregor wrote: > Probably on the server's side it got an ICMP Host Unreachable or two as > some router updated its tables, and decided to close the connection. The > FIN jumped the queue in one/several of the routers in the path, so it got > reordered relative to the data. This would imply that the router in > question had its route to you back by the time the FIN got there. > > Wierd, but far from impossible. Nothing is impossible with routers, including sending ICMP packets using different routing than TCP (and doing odd things with UDP as well). Sometimes ICMP will be sent over a low bandwidth link with hopefully less latency. The phrase "the less traveled way" comes to mind. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/