Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752400AbbDBUx6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2015 16:53:58 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com ([209.85.213.179]:37992 "EHLO mail-ig0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752293AbbDBUxw (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2015 16:53:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 15:53:47 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , "David S. Miller" , Hans Verkuil , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Alexei Starovoitov , stephen hemminger , Masahiro Yamada , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pci: export class IDs from pci_ids.h Message-ID: <20150402205347.GA10892@google.com> References: <1427714755-16873-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1427714755-16873-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1613 Lines: 34 On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 01:33:28PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > The basic class ID macros in pci_ids.h are pretty useful for userspace > using the pci sysfs interface, and they aren't fundamentally different > from the constants in pci_regs.h - both are defined in the > pci spec. > > At the moment userspace is forced to duplicate these macros > (e.g. QEMU does this, so do seabios, gpxe, and others), it is better to > expose them in /usr/include/linux/pci_ids.h so everyone can just include > this header. I agree that it would be nice for applications to get these definitions from a single place, but I'm not sure that include/uapi/linux/pci_ids.h needs to be that place. These constants are just copies of what's in the spec, and I don't think you're suggesting that the constants are necessary to use a kernel API. I know the kernel does provide access to values via sysfs "class" files, but the kernel is just passing the values through from the hardware. That's analogous to reading the class with setpci, and I don't think it leads to a requirement that the kernel export all the information about how to interpret the class values. I haven't looked at libpci or libudev, but it sounds like you think those are not good solutions. Is that because they don't currently have this information? People don't want to add dependencies on them? Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/