Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 21:38:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 21:38:32 -0500 Received: from havoc.daloft.com ([64.213.145.173]:4562 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 21:38:31 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 21:47:10 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik To: John Jasen Cc: Philip Dodd , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: UnitedLinux violating GPL? Message-ID: <20030110024710.GA19760@gtf.org> References: <3E1DFB8E.9050805@free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 974 Lines: 26 On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:40:50PM -0500, John Jasen wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Philip Dodd wrote: > > > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > Anybody know where the source rpm for UnitedLinux kernel is? > > > [to be distinguished from kernel-source rpm] > > if they supply the kernel source rpm, how are they in violation? Since you > can compile a kernel from the source rpm. Read the GPL :) The source code "preferred form" is clearly not an on-disk kernel tree with no information about the changes [patches] that were processed in a specific sequence, to produce that end result. Anyway, I would rather the thread die, since it is clear that they are _not_ in violation of the GPL, and the source code is available. :) Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/