MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+bK7J6rXtF54Tp1+mkDbv8Hok88MVZeC+mLvjjGjzZ4KtTHEw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1425076217-10415-1-git-send-email-bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
 <CAK=WgbYw2cuPGC0cnd0qgYF8pa5Rbe7i+JN9fEpXfjz=gw-FQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+bK7J6donXZvLqN2Fv_9dVYgj9j=xJAwmEEo86+XKZ4oj166A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK=WgbaAtBBNpf61rvO22TXq+6M6wk5jX1Cgxjqce8dXCJyigw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+bK7J6rXtF54Tp1+mkDbv8Hok88MVZeC+mLvjjGjzZ4KtTHEw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 16:55:56 +0300
Message-ID: <CAK=WgbZxZ0SUjZzBeqELZ=WQH5B5c41UCYc8_uHqOpgBtLVOfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] DT: hwspinlock: Add binding documentation for
 Qualcomm hwmutex
To: Tim Bird <tbird20d@gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
        Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>, Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>,
        "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@codeaurora.org>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1193
Lines: 28

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Tim Bird <tbird20d@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> wrote:
>> Sorry, I can't take this without a DT ack.
>
> Hmmm.
>
> The policy seems to be:
>      "For driver (not subsystem) bindings: If you are comfortable with the
>      binding, and it hasn't received an Acked-by from the devicetree
>      maintainers after a few weeks, go ahead and take it."
>
> The syscon property is only relative to the qcom hwspinlock driver,
> (unless I'm missing something) and both Qualcomm and Sony devs are
> OK with it.  So while an ACK from the DT side would be nice, I don't
> think it's required.  This is exactly the type of delay that is really
> holding up a lot of out-of-tree code.

Sorry, I do prefer to make sure Mark is OK with this devicetree patch,
especially since it wasn't clear whether Mark is entirely comfortable
with it in his last response.

Thanks,
Ohad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/