Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752403AbbDCVf7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2015 17:35:59 -0400 Received: from nblzone-211-213.nblnetworks.fi ([83.145.211.213]:51100 "EHLO hillosipuli.retiisi.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751256AbbDCVf4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2015 17:35:56 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 00:35:19 +0300 From: Sakari Ailus To: Pavel Machek Cc: Andrew Morton , pali.rohar@gmail.com, sre@debian.org, sre@ring0.de, kernel list , linux-arm-kernel , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, khilman@kernel.org, aaro.koskinen@iki.fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com, patrikbachan@gmail.com, galak@codeaurora.org, bcousson@baylibre.com, m.chehab@samsung.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] media: i2c/adp1653: devicetree support for adp1653 Message-ID: <20150403213519.GN20756@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> References: <20150402143846.GA11687@amd> <20150402161453.GH20756@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> <20150402203043.GB29963@amd> <20150402234823.GI20756@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> <20150403082344.GA14721@amd> <20150403112355.GJ20756@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> <20150403202953.GA5116@amd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150403202953.GA5116@amd> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1400 Lines: 41 On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:29:53PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Fri 2015-04-03 14:23:56, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > Hi Pavel, > > > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:23:44AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > > Hi Pawel, > > > > > > I'm still Pavel. v, not w. > > > > I know too many Pawels. Sorry about that. :-) > > > > > > I guess it uses adp1653_id_table. I'd hade to add redundand > > > information, because if it would just mask the errors if the code > > > changed... > > > > Indeed, that's true. This is comparing "adp1653" vs. comparing > > "adi,adp1653". I think I still prefer the latter since it's got also the > > vendor prefix included. > > > > Suppose we change this later and someone misspelled the vendor prefix --- > > their board would break. > > Suppose we do what you suggest. That does not fix the problem, since > code will still match the "adp1653" in case someone misspells it. > > If you want to change how i2c device matching works, well, you can do > it, but my patch is not right place to do that. Good point. Let's leave it as-is. -- Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ailus@iki.fi XMPP: sailus@retiisi.org.uk -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/