Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752507AbbDDPw0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Apr 2015 11:52:26 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0237.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.237]:53660 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751170AbbDDPwZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Apr 2015 11:52:25 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2110:2393:2553:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3350:3622:3865:3867:3870:3871:3872:3873:3874:4321:5007:6261:7903:8531:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: stone45_6c26ae6e8a326 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1493 Message-ID: <1428162741.2775.41.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: rtl8188eu: Remove zero testing pointer typed value From: Joe Perches To: Dan Carpenter Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 08:52:21 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20150404135818.GW10964@mwanda> References: <20150403164211.GA6422@amitoj-Inspiron-3542> <20150403165113.GU10964@mwanda> <1428080470.13180.19.camel@perches.com> <20150403210458.GV10964@mwanda> <20150404135818.GW10964@mwanda> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10-0ubuntu1~14.10.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 754 Lines: 20 On Sat, 2015-04-04 at 16:58 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 12:04:59AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > 1) It's more clear when read in English. "if not strcmp then" or > > "if strcmp NOT EQUAL zero". > Oops. I got that reversed. I meant "if strcmp then". Only serves to > emphasize my point though. :) When I read it I understood what you meant, but I thought the point was everybody makes mistakes. !strcmp to test equality is still pretty idiomatic. !memcmp too. cheers, Joe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/