Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752838AbbDFQkg (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Apr 2015 12:40:36 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48]:36561 "EHLO mail-la0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752650AbbDFQkd (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Apr 2015 12:40:33 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <551DC94C.3060001@codeaurora.org> References: <1427928946-31291-1-git-send-email-bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com> <551DBC05.2090301@codeaurora.org> <20150402222630.GV6023@sirena.org.uk> <551DC94C.3060001@codeaurora.org> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 09:40:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Refactor Qualcomm RPM regulator to single platform_device From: Bjorn Andersson To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Mark Brown , Bjorn Andersson , Andy Gross , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Lee Jones , Liam Girdwood , Mark Rutland , Pawel Moll , Rob Herring , Srinivas Kandagatla , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arm-msm , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1663 Lines: 42 On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 04/02/15 15:26, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 03:00:37PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> >>> What happens with debugfs when you have multiple pmics with the same >>> named regulator? I thought that in this case we needed to make the names >>> unique somehow or we would end up with the same directory for two >>> different regulators. >> Guenther sent a patch fixing that a while back. > > This one? > > commit a9eaa8130707d4013fb109b80323489c0d0111ac > Author: Guenter Roeck > AuthorDate: Fri Oct 17 08:17:03 2014 -0700 > Commit: Mark Brown > CommitDate: Fri Mar 27 16:14:18 2015 -0700 > > regulator: Ensure unique regulator debugfs directory names > > Ok. Seems to be only in next. I'm not sure it will work though because > in this case the parent device is the same for both regulators on > different PMICs that the RPM is controlling. I could be wrong though > because I haven't tested it. > You're right Stephen; for the platforms with multiple pmics this will spit out a bunch of warnings and Guenter's fix does not change that fact. Either we make the regulator names more specific (like pm8058_l1) or we build desc.name out of pdev->dev.of_node->name and the regulator name. I like the latter, so unless someone object I'll respin it that way. Regards, Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/