Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 08:02:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 08:02:29 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:58264 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 08:02:28 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 05:11:00 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Erich Focht Cc: Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel , Robert Love Subject: Re: small migration thread fix Message-ID: <20030110131100.GS23814@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Erich Focht , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel , Robert Love References: <200301101346.03653.efocht@ess.nec.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200301101346.03653.efocht@ess.nec.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 763 Lines: 18 On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 01:46:03PM +0100, Erich Focht wrote: > the small patch fixes a potential problem in the migration thread for > the case that the first CPU in the cpus_allowed mask of a process is > offline. Please consider applying it to your trees. I'm not mingo, but I can say this looks sane. My only question is whether there are more codepaths that need this kind of check, for instance, what happens if someone does set_cpus_allowed() to a cpumask with !(task->cpumask & cpu_online_map) ? Thanks, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/