Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 08:18:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 08:18:29 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:15762 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 08:18:29 -0500 Subject: Re: Problem in IDE Disks cache handling in kernel 2.4.XX From: Alan Cox To: Andre Hedrick Cc: fverscheure@wanadoo.fr, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Marcelo Tosatti In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1042207998.28469.98.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-2) Date: 10 Jan 2003 14:13:19 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 641 Lines: 18 On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:03, Andre Hedrick wrote: > Oh, just let the darn thing barf a 0x51/0x04 is fine with me! > Just an abort/unsupported command. Sounds ok to me. We do need a barfsupressor option so we can issue commands that may fail without confusing the user (eg multiwrite setup) ie ide_hwif_barfsupress(hwif); ide_command.... That's very much true irrespective of the flush thing - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/