Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753273AbbDGI4x (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2015 04:56:53 -0400 Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:42113 "EHLO www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751150AbbDGI4v (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2015 04:56:51 -0400 Message-ID: <55239BAD.6040304@iogearbox.net> Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 10:56:13 +0200 From: Daniel Borkmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar , Stephen Rothwell CC: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree References: <20150407171858.2ad46594@canb.auug.org.au> <20150407084829.GA9577@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150407084829.GA9577@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: daniel@iogearbox.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1306 Lines: 36 On 04/07/2015 10:48 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc >> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: >> >> kernel/events/core.c: In function 'perf_event_set_bpf_prog': >> kernel/events/core.c:6732:15: error: 'struct bpf_prog_aux' has no member named 'prog_type' >> if (prog->aux->prog_type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE) { >> ^ >> >> Caused by commit 2541517c32be ("tracing, perf: Implement BPF programs >> attached to kprobes"). > > Note, this must be some (rarely triggered) aspect of the ppc64 > defconfig that neither x86 randconfigs nor most other arch defconfigs > expose? Note, this is a merge conflict with the work that went via net-next tree, i.e. 24701ecea76b ("ebpf: move read-only fields to bpf_prog and shrink bpf_prog_aux"). I believe that is why it didn't trigger on tip tree. You should be able to resolve it in linux-next by changing the test to: if (prog->prog_type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE) { Thanks, Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/