Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 09:38:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 09:38:17 -0500 Received: from ealliance.ro ([213.233.121.14]:33693 "HELO ealliance.ro") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 09:38:15 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Mihnea Balta To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Kernel hooks just to get rid of copy_[to/from]_user() and syscall overhead? Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:45:39 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <200301101645.39535.dark_lkml@mymail.ro> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1137 Lines: 26 Hi, I have to implement a system which grabs udp packets off a gigabit connection, take some basic action based on what they contain, repack their data with a custom protocol header and send them through a gigabit ethernet interface on broadcast. I know how to do this in userspace, but I need to know if doing everyting in the kernel would show a considerable speed improvement due to removing syscall and memory copy overhead. The system will be quite stressed, having to deal with around 15-20000 packets/second. I didn't want to start this e-mail with an excuse, so I delayed it until here :). I appologise if this isn't the right place to ask, it seemed that way to me. I wasn't able to find sufficient and coherent information about this issue on the internet or on this mailing list's archives, so I decided to ask you people directly. Thanks for your time, Mihnea Balta - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/