Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 15:56:35 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>,
        Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
        Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: smp: Only expose /sys/.../cpuX/online if
 hotpluggable
Message-ID: <20150407145635.GI12732@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1428351853-5844-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1428351853-5844-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2161
Lines: 44

On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 01:24:13PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Writes to /sys/.../cpuX/online fail if we determine the platform
> doesn't support hotplug for that CPU. Furthermore, if the cpu_die
> op isn't specified the system hangs when we try to offline a CPU
> and it comes right back online unexpectedly. Let's figure this
> stuff out before we make the sysfs nodes so that the online file
> doesn't even exist if it isn't (at least sometimes) possible to
> hotplug the CPU.
> 
> Add a new 'cpu_can_disable' op and repoint all 'cpu_disable'
> implementations at it because all implementers use the op to
> indicate if a CPU can be hotplugged or not in a static fashion.
> With PSCI we may need to add a 'cpu_disable' op so that the
> secure OS can be migrated off the CPU we're trying to hotplug.
> In this case, the 'cpu_can_disable' op will indicate that all
> CPUs are hotpluggable by returning true, but the 'cpu_disable' op
> will make a PSCI migration call and occasionally fail, denying
> the hotplug of a CPU. This shouldn't be any worse than x86 where
> we may indicate that all CPUs are hotpluggable but occasionally
> we can't offline a CPU due to check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable()
> failing to find a CPU to move vectors to.
> 
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
> Cc: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
> Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
> Cc: <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>

I think this is fine, but I'd like to see some acks for it.  As it's
mostly core ARM stuff, it should be merged through my tree unless there
is a known conflict with arm-soc.  Thanks.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/