Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:33:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:33:19 -0500 Received: from modemcable092.130-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca ([24.200.130.92]:34546 "EHLO montezuma.mastecende.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:32:17 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:41:48 -0500 (EST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo X-X-Sender: zwane@montezuma.mastecende.com To: Dave Jones cc: William Lee Irwin III , "" , "" Subject: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? In-Reply-To: <20030110162834.GB23375@codemonkey.org.uk> Message-ID: References: <20030110161012.GD2041@holomorphy.com> <20030110162834.GB23375@codemonkey.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1103 Lines: 27 On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Dave Jones wrote: > There's still a boatload of drivers that don't compile, > a metric shitload of bits that never came over from 2.4 after > I stopped doing it circa 2.4.18, a lot of little 'trivial' > patches that got left by the wayside, and a load of 'strange' bits > that still need nailing down (personally, I have two boxes > that won't boot a 2.5 kernel currently (One was pnpbios related, I had a problem with PCI init, pnpbios ordering at some point, but i haven't tried a kernel with pnpbios in a while. > other needs more investigation), and another that falls on its > face after 10 minutes idle uptime. My p4-ht desktop box is the only one > that runs 2.5 without any problems. Thats interesting, i have a laptop experiencing the same symptoms, i'll be looking at it over the weekend. Zwane -- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/