Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:40:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:40:07 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:25244 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:40:05 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:48:34 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Alan Cox , Andre Hedrick Cc: fverscheure@wanadoo.fr, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: Problem in IDE Disks cache handling in kernel 2.4.XX Message-ID: <20030110164834.GM843@suse.de> References: <1042207998.28469.98.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1042207998.28469.98.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 891 Lines: 26 On Fri, Jan 10 2003, Alan Cox wrote: > On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:03, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > Oh, just let the darn thing barf a 0x51/0x04 is fine with me! > > Just an abort/unsupported command. > > Sounds ok to me. We do need a barfsupressor option so we can issue > commands that may fail without confusing the user (eg multiwrite setup) > > ie > ide_hwif_barfsupress(hwif); > ide_command.... > > That's very much true irrespective of the flush thing In the barrier patches, I just used drive->quiet to supress ide_error() complaining too much (on cache flushes, too). Whether that's per-drive of per-hwif entity, dunno... -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/