Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 12:25:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 12:25:41 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:4626 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 12:25:40 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 09:29:36 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Dave Jones cc: Alan Cox , William Lee Irwin III , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? In-Reply-To: <20030110170625.GE23375@codemonkey.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1119 Lines: 28 On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Dave Jones wrote: > > What's happening with the OSS drivers ? > I'm still carrying a few hundred KB of changes from 2.4 for those. > I'm not going to spent a day splitting them up, commenting them and pushing > to Linus if we're going to be dropping various drivers. I consider them to be old drivers, the same way "hd.c" was. Not necessarily useful for most people, but neither was hd.c. And it was around for a _long_ time (heh. I needed to check. The config option is still there ;) So I don't see a huge reason to remove them from the sources, but we might well make them harder to select by mistake, for example. Right now the config help files aren't exactly helpful, and the OSS choice is before the ALSA one, which looks wrong. They should probably be marked deprecated, and if they don't get a lot of maintenance, that's fine. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/