Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 12:30:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 12:30:16 -0500 Received: from mail2.scram.de ([195.226.127.112]:60170 "EHLO mail2.scram.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 12:30:15 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 18:37:46 +0100 (CET) From: Jochen Friedrich X-X-Sender: jochen@gfrw1044.bocc.de To: Alan Cox cc: William Lee Irwin III , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? In-Reply-To: <1042219147.31848.65.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 958 Lines: 25 On 10 Jan 2003, Alan Cox wrote: > On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 16:10, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > > Any specific concerns/issues/wishlist items you want taken care of > > before doing it or is it a "generalized comfort level" kind of thing? > > Let me know, I'd be much obliged for specific directions to move in. > > IDE is all broken still and will take at least another three months to > fix - before we get to 'improve'. As is the whole frame buffer mess. USB slowly seems to return to a working state. ISDN seems to be a total mess, as well. > No more "ISAPnP TNG" and module rewrites please Full ACK. There are still archs without working module code, right now (parisc and mips come to my mind). --jochen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/